logo for chinese-antique-porcelain.com
Home
Blog / Forum
Glossary
.............................. Ancient China Trade
Image Gallery
Marks
Authentication
Cyclic Calendar
Chinese Calendar
History timeline
Ming-Qing Emperors
Major Collections
Porcelain Age Signs
Reproductions
Fake Antiques
Buying Antiques
Value of Antiques
............................... E-Book
Porcelain Care
China Repair
............................... Chinese Zodiac
Chinese Tea Culture
Search
Sitemap
............................... Privacy Policy
Contact
About

[?] Subscribe To This Site

XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines

LEFT for chinese-antique-porcelain.com

SANCAI BOWL NUMBER 2

by Andrew

Have added 4 images of bowl number 2.

Comments for
SANCAI BOWL NUMBER 2

Click here to add your own comments

Nov 11, 2011
REPLY TO TIM'S REQUEST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
by: Andrew

Hi Tim,
to answer your, how when where interest...I purchased the bowls in Australia with money about a month ago. There was no other information provided about the bowls, apart from the price tags.
I don't see how this can really be of help to you in your pending assessment,but if you have any knowledge or opinion about the bowls, please share it with the Forum, so others may learn a little more from a contribution, as Peter is the only one that seems to help us amateur collectors & further discussion & support would be appreciated & should be encouraged.
Well, it's up to you now!
regards, Andrew.

Nov 05, 2011
sancai
by: peter

Andrew,
I mean the clay is too red, too dark. The red one I know is lighter.
I think I mentioned "fakes" only in relation with matters belonging to the analysis?

Simply said, I don't know what you have. The bowl is unlike anything I know about Tang Sancai. But that is not much, so I'm in no position to judge if any of these bowls could be from there.

Nov 05, 2011
REPLY TO PETER'S THOUGHTS ON THESE BOWLS.
by: Andrew

thanks for the input Peter.
Could you elaborate on what you mean by "doubts"of the underside?
I have seen images of Tang bases finished with a scooped out foot, similar to these, but more neater & obviously from a lighter clay body.
Some elaboration of the red clay body...underside would help me understand what you are actually inferring.
The age seems to be there on the glazes, but if you think these could be fakes...then fakes of what exactly?
I thought Tang style Sancai made in the middle east could be possible as the red clay is even used today....but I can't seem to pinpoint origin of this style.
Liao sancai that I looked at on net, seem all to be made of a lighter harder paste, not red.
regards, Andrew

Nov 04, 2011
Bowls do not resemble traditional sancai
by: Tim

Hey, Andrew,

Before I make further assessment of your bowls, can you as well as everybody who will be posting inquiries in the future, provide some background as to how, where and when you obtained the objects? Also, how long have you had them, and what were you told about them at time of purchase?
A little information will go a long way in aiding the assessment of the objects at hand.

Thanks

Tim

Nov 04, 2011
bowls
by: peter

I have doubts about the underside of the bowls. They don't look as those I have seen. Further, I have also doubts about the decoration of the first bowl. As far as I know there were no patterns painted on Tang Sancai wares. With that I mean the Tang Sancai wares were colored in a simple fashion, but not really decorated.

Have you looked at Liao Sancai wares? They could be different.

Click here to add your own comments

footer for antique Chinese porcelain page