logo for chinese-antique-porcelain.com
Home
Blog / Forum
Glossary
.............................. Ancient China Trade
Image Gallery
Marks
Authentication
Cyclic Calendar
Chinese Calendar
History timeline
Ming-Qing Emperors
Major Collections
Porcelain Age Signs
Reproductions
Fake Antiques
Buying Antiques
Value of Antiques
............................... E-Book
Porcelain Care
China Repair
............................... Chinese Zodiac
Chinese Tea Culture
Search
Sitemap
............................... Privacy Policy
Contact
About

[?] Subscribe To This Site

XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines

LEFT for chinese-antique-porcelain.com

Reign Mark on Chinese Porcelain

by Carol
(San Francisco)

I have a piece of pottery that has a reign mark that is neither Qing nor Ming dynasty. I don't read Chinese. What does this say?

Comments for
Reign Mark on Chinese Porcelain

Click here to add your own comments

Apr 05, 2011
mark
by: peter

Hi Carol,
I'm pretty sure this is a fake.
1) There is no dynasty name and no reign name.
2)The second and fourth characters (read right to left) each has a point, which these characters don't have, in reality.
3)The third character is in simplified writing, which was introduced in 1956.
4)Further, proper reign marks have "Nian Zhi" (year made) as the last two characters, here the "year" character is replaced by "elegance".
5)The two concentric rings are too regular. Handwritten circles would have some irregularity in stroke width or color darkness, somewhere, as the dye would be plenty at the beginning and less towards the end. This quality is only possible in imperial porcelain, which always would have the proper imperial name.

All in all, too many factors wrong to be genuine.

Click here to add your own comments

footer for antique Chinese porcelain page