logo for chinese-antique-porcelain.com
Home
Blog / Forum
Glossary
.............................. Ancient China Trade
Image Gallery
Marks
Authentication
Cyclic Calendar
Chinese Calendar
History timeline
Ming-Qing Emperors
Major Collections
Porcelain Age Signs
Reproductions
Fake Antiques
Buying Antiques
Value of Antiques
............................... E-Book
Porcelain Care
China Repair
............................... Chinese Zodiac
Chinese Tea Culture
Search
Sitemap
............................... Privacy Policy
Contact
About

[?] Subscribe To This Site

XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines

LEFT for chinese-antique-porcelain.com

ID Vase with one line Mark.

by Brad
(Washington)

Mark on the bottom

Mark on the bottom

Mark on the bottom Front view Necks from the top Side view

Brought back this vase from china a few years ago. It was from a very private old collection. The mark on the bottom is horizontal, and I have not seen many of these. Please look at the pictures and let me know if you can help me identify the piece.

Regards,

Brad

Comments for
ID Vase with one line Mark.

Click here to add your own comments

Oct 07, 2011
Link to Hi-res Pictures
by: Brad

s1222.photobucket.com/albums/dd493/lightguru1/?albumview=slideshow&track=share_email_album_view_click

Oct 07, 2011
Probabaly not authentic
by: James

I agree with peter that the picture shows the mark being a mirror image of a Yongzheng mark. The painting style showing Westerners however, are more in fashion during Qianlong's period.

Even though some paintings of Westerners at the time show the typical Westerner outfits baring female shoulders and cleavage, I don't think they have gotten to the point of being able to accept seeing completely naked breasts like these on a vase.

Oct 06, 2011
mark
by: peter

Hi Brad,
The mark is a mirror image of what it should be. If this is what the mark really looks like, it is wrong.
This is a Qing dynasty Yongzheng reign mark.
This type of subject (foreigners painted in a western manner) is known to me only from the Qianlong reign.

As the pictures are small and the lighting isn't natural, I cannot comment on colors, etc.
If it were genuine, it would have to be something Sothebys might be interested in.
I cannot judge this one, however, as I have seen too few such items. But, the likelihood of getting the real thing in China within the last five or six years is remote (unless a price of five or six digits was involved), in my view.
I would suggest you ask for a second opinion.

Click here to add your own comments

footer for antique Chinese porcelain page